STRUKTUR ARGUMENTASI TEKS DEBAT SANDIWARA INDRAMAYU:KAJIAN ANALISIS WACANA PEMENTASAN BINA REMAJA INDAH

Firdaus Satria Pribawah; Saroni

Authors

Firdaus Satria Pribawah Universitas Wiralodra
Saroni Universitas Wiralodra

Keywords:

critical discourse analysis, argumentative structure, debate text, Indramayu sandiwara

Abstract

This study examines how argumentative structures are constructed in the debate text of the Bina Remaja Indah Indramayu sandiwara performance, focusing on the interaction between Ki Tiong and Demang BI Kartasura in the first scene (Drip 1). Using the three-dimensional critical discourse analysis framework proposed by Teun A. van Dijk, this qualitative descriptive research is based on data obtained from video recordings that were transcribed into written form. The analysis reveals that the debate develops through a recurring argumentative pattern involving stages such as claim, rebuttal, and reinforcement, supported by the use of rhetorical questions, affective diction, and analogical reasoning grounded in moral and religious values. From a social cognition perspective, the debate reflects a contrast between agrarian resistance and colonial pragmatism, while in its broader social context, it represents a form of symbolic resistance discourse rooted in the historical experience of colonialism in Indramayu. Overall, the study highlights that van Dijk’s model is applicable for analyzing traditional performance texts and offers a contribution to the academic documentation of local cultural discourse.

References

Cook, G. (1989). Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Djajasudarma, T. F. (2012). Wacana dan pragmatik. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.

Eriyanto. (2001). Analisis wacana: Pengantar analisis teks media. Yogyakarta: LKiS.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London: Longman.

Humaira, H. W. (2018). Analisis wacana kritis (AWK) model Teun A. van Dijk pada pemberitaan surat kabar Republika. Jurnal Literasi, 2(1), 32–40.

Jorgensen, M. W., & Phillips, L. J. (2002). Discourse analysis as theory and method. London: Sage Publications.

Kridalaksana, H. (2011). Kamus linguistik (Edisi ke-4). Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

Mahsun. (2017). Metode penelitian bahasa: Tahapan strategi, metode dan tekniknya (Edisi ke-3). Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (Edisi revisi). Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nurgiyantoro, B. (2014). Teori pengkajian fiksi. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Pudentia, M. P. S. S. (2015). Metodologi kajian tradisi lisan (Edisi revisi). Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Riantiarno, N. (2011). Kitab teater: Tanya jawab seputar seni pertunjukan. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.

Rijal, S. (2020). Analisis wacana kritis dalam teks debat politik: Kajian model van Dijk. Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 8(2), 112–125.

Srikandhi Astriana Gusti. (2025). Manajemen seni pertunjukan grup Sandiwara Lingga Buana di Indramayu (Tugas Akhir S-1 tidak diterbitkan). Institut Seni Indonesia Yogyakarta.

Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse analysis: The sociolinguistic analysis of natural language. Oxford: Blackwell.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument (Updated ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006

van Dijk, T. A. (1995). Discourse semantics and ideology. Discourse & Society, 6(2), 243–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926595006002006

van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (2004). A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2009). Methods of critical discourse analysis (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.